International Journal of Contemporary Research in Multidisciplinary

Abstract:

The adoption rights of same-sex couples in India represent a critical juncture in the nation's evolving legal and social landscape. Rooted in a traditional framework where family structures revolve around heterosexual marriage, procreation, and lineage, Indian society often resists alternative forms of family. This resistance is compounded by deeply entrenched biases, social misconceptions, and an inadequate legal infrastructure, creating significant barriers for same-sex couples aspiring to adopt children. Despite incremental progress in LGBTQ+ rights, the absence of comprehensive legal recognition for same-sex relationships poses substantial challenges to their parenting aspirations, leaving many vulnerable to systemic discrimination and social exclusion. This study delves into the societal, ethical, and psychological dimensions of adoption by same-sex couples, situating the issue within India’s complex cultural and legal context. It critiques the limitations of existing legislative frameworks, such as the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act (HAMA) and the Guardians and Wards Act (GAWA), which fail to account for the diverse needs of adoptive families, especially those led by same-sex couples. Additionally, the study highlights the systemic gaps in the Juvenile Justice Act and the recent Adoption of Children (Amendment) Bill, which, while progressive, still do not adequately address the unique challenges faced by LGBTQ+ individuals in the adoption process. Through an analysis of judicial precedents, reports from human rights organizations, and contemporary public debates, the paper identifies the myths and prejudices perpetuating societal opposition to same-sex parenting. These include concerns about the developmental well-being of children raised in nontraditional families and the stress of navigating a stigmatized societal environment. The research emphasizes that these fears are largely unfounded and rooted in prejudice rather than evidence, and it advocates for a child-centric approach to adoption policies, focusing on providing every child with a loving and nurturing home. By exploring the intersectionality of legal, social, and cultural dynamics, this paper argues for the urgent need for inclusive legal reforms that recognize the rights of same-sex couples to adopt. It calls for a shift in societal perspectives, driven by public awareness campaigns, judicial advocacy, and legislative changes. Ultimately, the study aims to foster a society where love, care, and acceptance transcend traditional prejudices, ensuring that the best interests of children remain paramount while promoting equality and justice for all.

Keywords:

Adoption rights, LGBTQ+ rights, Social misconceptions, Child-centric policies, Human rights

Aim/Objectives

Methods